🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.4/5 from 841+ reviews
Homeβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Shark Ion Robot Vacuum

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.4 out of 5(841 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$200
$333.33
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Baught this and not ever used it. Thanks for looking

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Shark Ion Robot Vacuum

Baught this and under no circumstances used it. Thanks for looking

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Home products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 482903

Category: Home > Cleaning Supplies > Sweeping

Original Price:$333.33 USD

Sale Price:$200 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.4
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8572 reviews
TT
Thomas Taylor βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Couldn't be happier
Good experience overall Shark Ion Robot Vacuum.
13 people found this helpful
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless for my needs
After assorted use, it works well enough and it meets expectations.
14 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
flawless purchase
Personally, the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum performs as expected and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
30 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Dallas, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
appreciate it!
From my experience, the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum works as described and I’m satisfied.
12 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceptional quality
I was worried about quality, but the Shark Ion Robot Vacuum turned out fine.
13 people found this helpful