🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 708+ reviews
Toysβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage toy block

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.3 out of 5(708 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$5.55​
$9.25
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Vintage toy blockToy Collector'sFrom a smoke-no-cost home

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage toy block

Vintage toy block
Toy Collector's

From a smoke-on the house home​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Toys products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 667159

Category: Toys > Building Toys > Stacking Blocks

Original Price:$9.25 USD

Sale Price:$5.55 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8891 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid investment​
So far, the Vintage toy block feels okay so I’m okay with it. Works fine so far.
50 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous quality
From my experience, the Vintage toy block feels solid which is good enough. Nothing fancy.
40 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Honolulu, HI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
In daily use, it works fine and it’s fine overall.
16 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell
5 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb in every way
At first, the Vintage toy block does its job and it meets expectations.
42 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Omaha, NE
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely magnificent
After some use, the Vintage toy block is hassle-on the house to use and I don’t regret it.
5 people found this helpful