🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 448+ reviews
Womenβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller

Trousers - rsn

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.5 out of 5(448 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$40​
$66.67
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Rise : HighFastening : Concealed flyPockets : Back pocket, side pockets, leg pocketPattern : PlainArticle number : RV421A02L-O11

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
hassle-gratis Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Trousers - rsn

Rise : High
Fastening : Concealed fly
Pockets : Back pocket, side pockets, leg pocket
Pattern : Plain
Article number : RV421A02L-O11​

This product is ideal for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1250611

Category: Women > Clothing > Trousers

Original Price:$66.67 USD

Sale Price:$40 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand fresh

🚚 shipment & Returns

βœ“ on the house shipment on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8518 reviews
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
splendid choice​
I think the Trousers - rsn will be useful long term.
18 people found this helpful
KC
Kayla Campbell βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Indianapolis, IN
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
highly happy
At first, it works fine and it’s fine overall.
16 people found this helpful
EY
Elizabeth Young βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exactly what I needed
So far, the Trousers - rsn performs as expected so it’s acceptable.
47 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Baltimore, MD
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Highly satisfied
The Trousers - rsn arrived quickly and neatly.
15 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia βœ“ Verified Purchase 
3 months ago Β· Aurora, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
appreciate it!
The Trousers - rsn feels normal, not cost-effective, not fancy.
44 people found this helpful