🚚 on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 733+ reviews
Vintageβœ“ In StockπŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Snap on belt buckle

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…4.2 out of 5(733 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9.72
$16.2
Sale
βœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Belt buckle in good condition

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
express fulfillment
↩️
effortless Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Snap on belt buckle

Belt buckle in good condition

This product is magnificent for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1748863

Category: Vintage > Accessories > Buckles

Original Price:$16.2 USD

Sale Price:$9.72 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand simply-arrived

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

βœ“ at no charge distribution on orders over $50

Standard dispatch: 3-5 business days​

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2965 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore
10 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny
From my experience, the Snap on belt buckle is practical which feels reasonable.
39 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
superb Snap on belt buckle!
Honestly, the Snap on belt buckle is hassle-no-cost to use and I’m satisfied. No setup issues.
48 people found this helpful
NH
Nicole Harris βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations
From my experience, the Snap on belt buckle feels okay and it works for me. Nothing fancy.
50 people found this helpful​
MK
Megan King βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent quality
Honestly, the Snap on belt buckle performs as expected and it’s fine overall. No setup issues.
3 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase 
11 months ago Β· Los Angeles, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
No complaints
For the price, the Snap on belt buckle does its job which is good enough. distribution was normal.
12 people found this helpful