๐Ÿšš on the house SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.3/5 from 575+ reviews
Vintageโœ“ In Stock๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

Starbucks "Chicago" mug

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…4.3 out of 5(575 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$10
$16.67
Sale
โœ“ on the house fulfillment on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

prefer recent still has the original price tag on it

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
rapid distribution
โ†ฉ๏ธ
functional Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

Starbucks "Chicago" mug

fancy latest still has the original price tag on it​

This product is splendid for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1773152

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Mugs

Original Price:$16.67 USD

Sale Price:$10 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš shipment & Returns

โœ“ no-cost fulfillment on orders over $50

Standard shipping: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.3
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 7641 reviews
JM
Jessica Moore โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Aurora, CO
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
superior
Quality is decent. The Starbucks "Chicago" mug meets expectations.
19 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Tulsa, OK
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
Brilliant Starbucks "Chicago" mug
Read the reviews before buying the Starbucks "Chicago" mug and they were right - splendid product!
38 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Raleigh, NC
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Simply remarkable
Personally, the Starbucks "Chicago" mug performs as expected so Iโ€™m okay with it.
9 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท Tampa, FL

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
extraordinary quality
After a few days, the Starbucks "Chicago" mug feels okay which is good enough. Arrived on time.
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Portland, OR​
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜†
finest purchase ever
Personally, it works as described which is good enough.
11 people found this helpful